Download

Free Med Pocket Cards

Rationale of the Week | Primary Goals for the DPP?

For last week’s practice question, we quizzed participants on primary goals of the DPP. 62% of respondents chose the best answer. We want to clarify and share this important information, so you can pass it on to people living with diabetes and your colleagues, plus prepare for exam success!

 

Before we start though, if you don’t want any spoilers and haven’t tried the question yet, you can answer it below: Answer Question 

Lightbulb and text: Rationale of the Week

Question: The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) primary lifestyle intervention goals include achieving and maintaining a minimum of 7% weight loss and 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week.

What outcomes are expected from these intervention goals? 

Answer Choices:

  1. DPP lifestyle intervention resulted in a 58% reduction of rate of diabetes over 3 years. 
  2. Sustained interventions over 15 years reduced risk of progression to type 2 diabetes by 27%.
  3. Achieving 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week without weight loss is adequate to reduce incidence of type 2 diabetes.
  4. All the above.
Pie chart of diabetes intervention effectiveness.

Getting to the Best Answer

If you are thinking about taking the certification exam, this practice test question will set you up for success. Test writers anticipate possible answers based on the details in the question. They will wave those “juicy answers” right under your nose. Your job is to weed through the particulars, pluck out the most important elements and choose the BEST answer.

Answer 1 is incorrect. 20.14% chose this answer. “DPP lifestyle intervention resulted in a 58% reduction of rate of diabetes over 3 years.” A is correct but is not the best answer. The initial DPP study included 1,079 participants who participated in lifestyle interventions and found a 58% reduction in the rate of diabetes.

Answer 2 is incorrect. 11.95% of you chose this answer. “Sustained interventions over 15 years reduced risk of progression to type 2 diabetes by 27%.” B is correct but not the best answer. The 15-year follow-up study validated that diabetes incidence was reduced by 27% for lifestyle intervention participants.

Answer 3 is incorrect. About 6.31% of respondents chose this. “Achieving 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week without weight loss is adequate to reduce incidence of type 2 diabetes.” Response C is correct but not the best answer. Weight loss is an important factor in reducing the risk of diabetes progression; however, the DPP study found that even without achieving weight loss goals, the incidence of type 2 diabetes was reduced by 44% if at least 150 minutes of physical activity per week was achieved. 

Finally, Answer 4 is correct. 61.60% chose this answer. “All of the above.” Answer D is correct and is the best answer.

References: 

  • American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee; 3. Prevention or Delay of Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024Diabetes Care1 January 2024; 47 (Supplement_1): S43–S51. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-S003

National Diabetes Prevention Program Coverage Toolkit. Downloaded on July 19th, 2024 from https://coveragetoolkit.org.

We hope you appreciate this week’s rationale! Thank you so much for taking the time to answer our Question of the Week and participate in this fun learning activity!

Sign up for Diabetes Blog Bytes – we post weekly Blog Bytes that are informative and FREE! Every week we post one exam practice Question of the Week and Rationale of the Week. Sign up below!

Accreditation: Diabetes Education Services is an approved provider by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider 12640, and our CPEU courses have received Prior Approval* from the Commission of Dietetic Registration (CDR), Provider DI002. Since our CPEU courses received Prior approval* from the CDR, these CPEU courses satisfy the CE requirements for the CDCES /BC-ADM regardless of your profession! 

The use of DES products does not guarantee the successful passage of the certification exam. CBDCE and ADCES do not endorse any preparatory or review materials for the CDCES or BC-ADM exams, except for those published by CBDCE & ADCES.